Skip to main content

Steven L. Taylor

Legal Research & Staff Counsel

Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association


In 1983, Steven L. Taylor received a B.A. degree in History from the University of Michigan. In 1986, he received a J.D. degree from the Ohio State University. He is a former law clerk for the Ohio Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate District, and for Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer of the Ohio Supreme Court.  

Steve served for many years as an Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and then as Chief Counsel of the Appellate Division of the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office.  Since 2009, he has served as the editor of the monthly Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association Case Digest and is now the Legal Research and Staff Counsel for the Association.

Product Type
On Demand

Sentencing Under the Reagan Tokes Act


Faculty:
Steven L. Taylor
Duration:
1 Hour 14 Minutes
Format:
Audio and Video
Short Description:
Effective March 22, 2019, Am.Sub.S.B. No. 201, otherwise known as the Reagan Tokes Act (RTA), enacted major changes in relation to first-degree and second-degree felonies by providing for indefinite s...

Product Type
On Demand

Top Seven Things to Know on Venue


Faculty:
Steven L. Taylor
Duration:
1 Hour 38 Minutes
Format:
Audio and Video
Short Description:
Beware the issue of venue.  Proving that the crime or an element thereof occurred in your jurisdiction is not an “element”, but it still must be established beyond a reasonable doubt and can result in...

Product Type
On Demand

Criminal Rule 16(K) & Avoiding the Hammer of Boaston Exclusion


Faculty:
Steven L. Taylor
Duration:
1 Hour 13 Minutes
Format:
Audio and Video
Short Description:
Adopted in 2010, Criminal Rule 16(K) mandates that the parties disclose their expert-witness reports at least 21 days before trial.  If the 21-day rule is violated, the remedy at trial is exclusion to...

Product Type
On Demand

The Legal Do’s and Don'ts of Closing Arguments


Faculty:
Steven L. Taylor
Duration:
1 Hour 3 Minutes
Format:
Audio and Video
Short Description:
The fundamentals of a good closing argument are mostly strategic and rhetorical, being designed to convince a properly-skeptical jury to come to the right conclusion on the facts.

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries